1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (118 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda 626 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 626 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |
