1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Pontiac G6

To start off, 2009 Pontiac G6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac G6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac G6 (219 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pontiac G6 weights approximately 97 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac G6 (297 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (169 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac G6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Mazda 626 2009 Pontiac G6
Make Mazda Pontiac
Model 626 G6
Year Released 1995 2009
Body Type Station Wagon Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 74 HP 219 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 169 Nm 297 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1255 kg 1352 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 61 L