1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 420 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chrysler Sebring. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Mazda | Chrysler |
Model | 626 | Sebring |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |