1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 486 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Charger (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | 626 | Charger |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3048 mm |