1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 15 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda 626 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 626 | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 140 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2702 mm |
