1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Saturn Vue
To start off, 2010 Saturn Vue is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Vue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Vue (172 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Vue should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saturn Vue (227 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Saturn Vue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2010 Saturn Vue | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 626 | Vue |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 227 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |