1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 165 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (300 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 626 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2648 mm |