1995 Mazda 626 vs. 2011 Volvo S80
To start off, 2011 Volvo S80 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (118 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2011 Volvo S80. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo S80 weights approximately 399 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo S80 (270 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda 626 | 2011 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | S80 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 67 L |