1995 Mazda Midge vs. 1983 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1983 Suzuki Fronte. (29 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1983 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda Midge weights approximately 411 kg more than 1983 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Suzuki Fronte. (41 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda Midge | 1983 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
| Model | Midge | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 543 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 29 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
