1995 Mazda Midge vs. 2005 Samsung SM5
To start off, 2005 Samsung SM5 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Samsung SM5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Samsung SM5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Samsung SM5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Samsung SM5 has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Samsung SM5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda Midge | 2005 Samsung SM5 | |
Make | Mazda | Samsung |
Model | Midge | SM5 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |