1995 Mazda Midge vs. 2007 Volvo S60
To start off, 2007 Volvo S60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo S60 (178 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Volvo S60 weights approximately 567 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo S60 (240 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda Midge | 2007 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Midge | S60 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 178 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1533 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
