1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 111 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | MX-3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |