1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda MX-3 weights approximately 119 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (134 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda MX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | MX-3 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 57 L |