1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1976 Volvo 240
To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (105 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 240. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 240 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 1976 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 240 (157 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (136 Nm). This means 1976 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 1976 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | MX-3 | 240 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2650 mm |