1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 207 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda MX-3 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | MX-3 | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |
