1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. Both 1995 Mazda MX-3 and 1999 Renault Clio are equipped with a 1,598 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 106 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda MX-3 weights approximately 64 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1999 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | MX-3 | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |