1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 286 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | MX-3 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |