1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MX-3 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |