1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Spyker C8 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Mazda | Spyker |
Model | MX-3 | C8 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 100 L |