1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda MX-3 weights approximately 615 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Mazda | Westfield |
| Model | MX-3 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2320 mm |
