1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | MX-3 | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |