1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | MX-3 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 134 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |