1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2009 Holden UTE

To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 252 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3.

Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (136 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3. 1995 Mazda MX-3 has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2009 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: