1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3.

Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: