1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 392 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | MX-3 | C30 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 134 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |