1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1481 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Mazda | Fisker |
Model | MX-3 | Karma |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 36 L |