1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP) has 280 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (136 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | MX-3 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 385 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |
