1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C-Zero weights approximately 21 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Zero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Citroen C-Zero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | MX-3 | C-Zero |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1059 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2550 mm |