1995 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2012 Ford F-450
To start off, 2012 Ford F-450 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-450 (399 HP) has 294 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 2012 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm) has 949 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (136 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda MX-3 | 2012 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | MX-3 | F-450 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 399 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 1085 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 6680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2438 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 2024 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 4379 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 142 L |
