1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2.5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2.5 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda RX-01 | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | RX-01 | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |