1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda RX-01 | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-01 | 120 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2610 mm |