1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 1971 ZIL 114
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda RX-01. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2075 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 ZIL 114 (581 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1971 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 1971 ZIL 114 | |
| Make | Mazda | ZIL |
| Model | RX-01 | 114 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 6959 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 581 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 3175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3770 mm |
