1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 1972 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 160 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda RX-01 | 1972 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-01 | 240 C |
Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |