1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | Mazda | Acura |
| Model | RX-01 | TL |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2840 mm |
