1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 660 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-01 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |