1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2003 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Bora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 131 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Bora. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Bora.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Bora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Volkswagen Bora has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volkswagen Bora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2003 Volkswagen Bora | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | RX-01 | Bora |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1900 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |
