1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | RX-01 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2490 mm |