1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-01 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |
