1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (169 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-01 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 169 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
