1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 235 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-01 | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 2946 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 61 L |