1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Mazda | Citroen |
| Model | RX-01 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
