1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2010 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2010 Ford Fusion is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Fusion weights approximately 587 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2010 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | RX-01 | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4841 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |
