1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-01 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
