1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-01 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
