1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01. 2011 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | RX-01 | XF |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |
