1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-01 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |
