1995 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Suzuki SX4 has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Suzuki SX4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-01 | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
| Model | RX-01 | SX4 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
