1995 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2001 Nissan Fusion
To start off, 2001 Nissan Fusion is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Fusion. (134 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Fusion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Fusion weights approximately 535 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Fusion (372 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mazda RX-7 | 2001 Nissan Fusion | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-7 | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1835 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2960 mm |
