1995 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2004 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2004 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Omega weights approximately 365 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Omega. (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mazda RX-7 | 2004 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-7 | Omega |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |