1995 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 290 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (270 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mercedes-Benz E | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | E | Renown |
Year Released | 1995 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2797 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |